首页> 外文OA文献 >Content and criterion validity evaluation of National Public Health Performance Standards measurement instruments.
【2h】

Content and criterion validity evaluation of National Public Health Performance Standards measurement instruments.

机译:国家公共卫生绩效标准测量工具的内容和标准效度评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Public Health Performance Standards Program (NPHPSP) has developed instruments to measure the performance of local and state public health departments on the 10 "Essential Services of Public Health," which have been tested in several states. This article is a report of the evaluation of the content and criterion validity of the local public health performance assessment instrument, and the content validity of the state public health performance assessment instrument. METHODS: Health department performance is measured using a set of indicators developed for the 10 Essential Services of Public Health and a model standard for each indicator. Content validity of each model standard in the local instrument was addressed by community partners along the following dimensions: the importance of each standard as a measure of the associated Essential Service, its completeness as a measure, and its reasonableness for achievement. All standards for each Essential Service were then judged in terms of their completeness in measuring performance in that service. Content validity of the state instrument was evaluated in a group interview of health department staff members from three states. Criterion validity of the local instrument was assessed for a sample of eight public health departments in Florida and six in New York by examining documentary evidence for selected responses. Criterion validity was also evaluated for a sample of Florida local public health departments and one Hawaii public health department by comparing state health department staffs' judgments of performance against the instrument score. RESULTS: Criterion validity was upheld for a summary performance score on the local instrument, but was not upheld for performance judgments on individual Essential Services. The NPHPSP standards based on the Essential Services have validity for measuring local public health system performance, according to community partners. The model standards are valid measures of state performance, according to state public health departments in three states. CONCLUSIONS: Within the scope of the validity evaluations completed, the NPHPSP state and local performance assessment instruments were found to be valid measures of public health performance.
机译:目的:疾病控制和预防中心的国家公共卫生绩效标准计划(NPHPSP)已开发出可测量地方和州公共卫生部门在10个“公共卫生基本服务”上的绩效的工具,该工具已在多个州进行了测试。本文是对地方公共卫生绩效评估工具的内容和标准有效性以及州公共卫生绩效评估工具的内容有效性进行评估的报告。方法:卫生部门的绩效是使用针对10个公共卫生基本服务制定的指标和每个指标的模型标准来衡量的。社区合作伙伴从以下方面解决了本地工具中每个标准标准的内容有效性:每个标准作为相关基本服务度量的重要性,度量标准的完整性以及实现的合理性。然后,根据每个服务基本标准的完整性来评估该服务的性能。在对来自三个州的卫生部门工作人员进行的小组访谈中,评估了该州仪器的内容有效性。通过检查选定响应的书面证据,对佛罗里达州的八个公共卫生部门和纽约的六个公共卫生部门的样本进行了评估,以评估当地文书的标准有效性。还通过将州卫生部门工作人员的绩效判断与仪器评分进行比较,对佛罗里达州地方公共卫生部门和一个夏威夷公共卫生部门的样本评估了标准有效性。结果:标准效度在本地工具的总体绩效评分中得到了维持,但在个别基本服务的绩效判断中却没有得到维持。社区合作伙伴称,基于基本服务的NPHPSP标准可有效衡量当地公共卫生系统的绩效。根据三个州的州公共卫生部门的说法,示范标准是衡量州绩效的有效指标。结论:在完成的有效性评估的范围内,NPHPSP州和地方绩效评估工具被认为是公共卫生绩效的有效度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号